On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Reza <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Do we need extra zeros here like 1.1.x or are 2 digits enough? > > Depends on how we want to version. So generally the first digit is major, > the second minor, and the 3rd maintenance. If this goes against a standard, > please enlighten me :) > > I suppose there is more especially those Eberhard mentioned from the .NET side, but we can probably stick to 3. > So new features go into minor releases and major features, changes, etc, > go into a major. Or if we think the product has changed enough to warrant a > major release, bump up the version. > > Ex: 1.1 is a typical feature release, 2.0 is a big release. 1.2.1 is a > maintenance release for 1.2. > > So yes, we can track the full release numbers. Just depends on how we want > to manage versions. > For JIRA 2 could be enough if everyone is happy, but then the question not just for BrowserMap is, what we put before the "-SNAPSHOT"? Until a fully interactive user-driven device data gathering can be rolled out, changes there would normally be in a maintenance release scale, too. Either based on user feedback (JIRA) or extra sources like OpenDDR where that changes on GitHub. So if device data is updated, the next build would be 1.0.1, should there be daily or Web Service driven changes, maybe an extra digit was even a good idea... > > Thoughts? > > > ________________________________ > From: Werner Keil <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" < > [email protected]>; Reza <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 10:48 AM > Subject: Re: Jira > > > Do we need extra zeros here like 1.1.x or are 2 digits enough? > > Any component or POM module in TRUNK that was tagged and expects changes in > the coming days or hours please don't forget to raise the version number in > the subsequent POMs to > either 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT or 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT (that depends on how we want to > increase the next number) as well as 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT or 1.4.2-SNAPSHOT for > browsermap. > > Thanks, > Werner > > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Reza <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > So I think I have all the components of the project here: > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/project-config/DMAP/components > > > > > > Ive added a few more tasks to the list this morning. In particular, I > > created an Epic to capture the W3C tasks since there will be several: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DMAP-49 > > > > > > As for versions, not sure if there is a way to give different components > > their own versioning scheme. The reason being is that im not sure its > going > > to be practical to keep all the components on the same versioning. Its > > important to try and track tasks with versions (ie: a roadmap), so maybe > we > > label the version with its component, ex: 1.1 (java-client), 1.1 (data), > > 1.5 (browsermap) > > >
