Not sure, how other projects do that, but the Apache Parent POM used by also the Data projects include such plugins. I figured, while Test-Data was not officially released, since it serves mainly unit tests, its version may be quite different from "live" data, so those projects that use both should have 2 different "data" version properties[?]
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Reza <[email protected]> wrote: > k, so if we can find the process for publishing to the public maven and > document that in DMAP-25, that would be a good first step :) > > > ________________________________ > From: Werner Keil <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" < > [email protected]>; Reza <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 1:43 PM > Subject: Re: Reza, you can tally the incubator PMC vote now > > > > Data pretty much is. I saw at least one file changed in the trunk since > the 1.0.0 release. Only NOTICE, but to be precise data's trunk now also > should be 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT. > Until there is a repository where stable releases can be grabbed from, the > temporary workspace availability of them in a trunk-only Maven build means, > all Maven-built clients should refer only to the trunk version of the data > files. > > If we had a stable 1.0.0 available somewhere, that could differ for > different APIs or more importantly examples, too. > > As my keys are also in the file I plan to get a W3C Simple DDR out, that > probably will not need many more versions than 1.0.0 as the underlying > standard is unlikely to change, so as we saw W3C missed putting the > standard itself out in a proper Maven repository, doing so with a DeviceMap > implementation also makes the W3C library available at least indirectly. > Not via Maven, that's not up to us, but e.g. a Web Servlet example shall > contain the JAR in a lib folder and together with the DeviceMap JARs from > Maven it builds without any annoying "Maven install" > > Werner > > > ________________________________ > > From: Werner Keil <[email protected]> > >To: Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> > >Cc: "[email protected]" < > [email protected]> > >Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 1:22 PM > > > >Subject: Re: Reza, you can tally the incubator PMC vote now > > > > > > > >Btw., seems none of the artifacts already released as 1.0.0 are in a Maven > >repo yet. > >Especially not here: http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/ And > I > >doubt even the Snapshot equivalent gets a deployment yet. > > > >For those artifacts that are officially released and approved, could they > >go into a maven repository, too? > > > >Werner > > > > > >On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz < > [email protected] > >> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Reza <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > ...moving forward the Java client will likely see less releases and > >> activity and the data will constantly evolve. That's why > >> > I'm thinking version in wise they will diverge greatly.... > >> > >> IMO having (even very) different version numbers between different > >> modules is not a problem. > >> > >> -Bertrand > >> >
