>> but do they have to burden the classifier and the XML resources ?
Classifier, no. Classify speed does not change with or without these devices in there. Resources, yes, these devices take up bandwidth, memory, and have to be parsed. So I would tag these for cleanup. ________________________________ From: eberhard speer jr. <[email protected]> To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 3:45 PM Subject: Data - Generic Devices -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I noticed that the 'generic' devices in the attached file have no 'children', meaning there are no devices who have them as parent device. We are talking about 51 'generic' devices out of 95 [if you count "generic-"] with 3,582 properties. I'm all for keeping them in the 'database', obviously, but do they have to burden the classifier and the XML resources ? The remaining 44 generics look 'sane' [no doubles]. esjr -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT/4bOAAoJEOxywXcFLKYc0DQIAJieS+KatKL21fHJqMDv1xxu r22pFtspWdoxsnHgXKTKxv6dHK/LLTxqkjEO+sQlomDFb9TTEL5x9LFN9ax33CkI zt8MD+YIzyn2EEW8SG/bWgKct1o40fajkzhVvHGdEP8Q9757qmHRh8XN/Q2pUXdC fWHg1VnRLcnQyOsuUPkriXTgMOmOB3m0J2IcGbUiLKemdYBTtuv9YbSlSaXJq8fv TWBoI7NFNLceWsIGokO79E5E8LptqILgpfOlcnIXh5rzsdn3Ek/25EyhwhyXSWts cANb1wNEkmAPof0c6BlTQUe5L5edXd0Er12pweeY4YN59DpnQfowD1SeDFoUeHA= =2zWN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
