-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
comparing the data sets etc I've found some 'worrying' stuff. This does not specifically involve 1.0.1, it involves all versions. If you look at for example NokiaE66, you'll notice that oddly enough it has a displayHeight but no displayWidth. Turns out NokiaE66 was introduced in version 1.4 [as they called it] of OpenDDR. Come version 1.7, NokiaE66 has no displayWidth property anymore. Take MOT-MB200, also introduced with 1.4, with mobile_browser_version property, by the time of they reach version 1.15 [so 1.4 was really 1.04] its mobile_browser_version property is gone. There are literally hundreds of cases like this where clearly the 'method' used to maintain the data [you can actually see the manual edits in the indents] ended up corrupting the data. Some [I would imagine *very* few] may be legitimate 'edits', what I'm referring to here are clear mistakes. Because I have a system that loaded the OpenDDR progressively, from the 1st release to the last, I can see these 'gaps' now. But it does mean that the current data inherited these gaps. esjr -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUDw+fAAoJEOxywXcFLKYc5tkH/34K1oTtMK9M7BHwWdWjCXxc SKDw7luqdh5Fae9q82VG8RrV3f8W1rHGvtXdMEjGjDz45ZgOErUOzf9tBr+cjN4p Oi7uHbVpwGrYueDpq358gZUfgJ8lgFU/8WNUDhjsxTNLI/sAVmUS+E9rM9JBuTeG Xu+ag9iZRysC675ztleKAjcsfvCNtwx9Frn63BiBn6CMEElG+8ovF2mEtsxkkrCx hqrL28ETffPmg95hazinkrN6hCp9FQOIJpOM/8UqdjWfO8eK4Aj9EZA0IYUiVCD7 xGvrxer4+aqLYlzTzrq2B5K4Uf7iS+SUAwy33VSqYnl2Fk1N8C+nHXSdYmJ/3ys= =1S3w -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
