Sure, I think Eberhard was puzzled to see it with 1.1;-)
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Reza <[email protected]> wrote: > Yup, thats one of our 2.0 goals... remember? > > From: Werner Keil <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" < > [email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 8:00 AM > Subject: Re: Java client release and graduation > > It says > "... This is important when we want to split our attributes up into 3 > classifications: device, os, and browser." > > 1.1 is not about that, it would not work as a 2.x File System/Repo > refactoring was required for any of that > > Werner > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:45 PM, eberhard speer jr. <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hi, > > > > can't comment on the Java, graduation etc aspects, but I would like to > > know more about "split our attributes up into 3 classifications: > > device, os, and browser" mentioned for 1.1 > > > > esjr > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) > > > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJURkdFAAoJEOxywXcFLKYcmdEH/A8NxzOd8fdmc46TI1Y7d87n > > ThAEIoHFtJYKWFEwdfzC9jRJc6nnsM3t4oaOIiUc/yZtSp9TKIahDq4eoAw3NZoA > > vrE38rwnFLRx3hb1H0Bi6qTHR0TTqxFCegkGY6iBiIsyfVVJjCNTFjjBZZ0Qvl0E > > WxlGZaVJPY/1gxj8r9vuM6tBx5YcAMSXTFfYFiXaL0cMG6lZnx9fxDkgcOh9EXcC > > hII1hA0QEuyFGdVXYJiHpKKQGWkg2G7Sue2nDxakJaqR+rgUyNxqgybw6O6m0QZ9 > > /uAMv2cf7C/cD5S/VEJm5GOIDKJAertOi8zUMYuD+EZg+oDnEEag4/x/vhu82/Y= > > =bEBs > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > >
