On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Anton Vorontsov <[email protected]> wrote: > (Cc'ing [email protected]) > > On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:50:15AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: >> Not till now. Here's what I've been working on. It's based on my >> test-devicetree branch. > [...] >> As you can see, I've pretty much come full circle on the adding >> 'automatic' OF support to gpio chips. Originally (as you well know) I >> was strongly opposed to any addition of OF code to the core gpiolib. >> All of the notifier work was a response to that. >> >> However, now that I actually have played with the code and looked and >> the issues deeply, I've got an entirely different opinion. > > ROFL :-D > >> (The fact >> that OF support is being ported to more architectures is also a >> factor.) > > Yeah, I guess without multi-arch OF effort such an OF+gpiolib > integration would be very dubious. But as OF spreads to other > architectures, and we already have of_node in the 'struct > device'... I guess that makes sense now. > >> Anyway, please take a look. > > It works here with some small fixes (patches on the way).
Thanks Anton. I'll look for them and pick them up. g. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
