Hi Stephen,

On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:47:55 -0700 Stephen Neuendorffer 
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Conceivably, device tree parsing could work on any architecture, but
> unless this is defined somewhere in Kconfig that is not architecture 
> specific, it won't work.
> 
> The architecture specific versions of this should get abstracted.
> ---
>  drivers/of/Kconfig |    4 ++++
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/Kconfig b/drivers/of/Kconfig
> index e8286d4..26957a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/of/Kconfig
> @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
> +config OF
> +     bool
> +     default n

You don't need the "default n", it is implicit.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    [email protected]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgpN0pe0xsKvc.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to