> > I doubt the need for irq_host will disappear. However I don't see that > going into the core under that name, so I think the rename is a very > valid thing to do now. We just need to sync the patches to avoid pure > mechanical clash.
I'm happy to spin/rebase the patch as needed. > Thomas initial series doesn't yet generalize the virq layer and that > will take a bit longer, so I'm happy to see Jon stuff go upstream first. My patch is against Linus' mainline. Not sure who might pick it up. jdl _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
