On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 10:55 +1100, David Gibson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 02:07:21PM -0500, Matthew McClintock wrote: > > Currently, when we run the following > > > > $> dtc -I fs -O dts /proc/device-tree > > > > We get the output in a "reverse order", this patch will reverse that > > output order and should resemble your initial device more closely > > Reverse order from what? Directory entries are unordered for most > intents and purposes - there's no guarantee that readdir() will return > entries in a consistent order, and behaviour in practice will vary > from one filesystem to another.
Ok, maybe I should word it as now ordered. =) > > Your patch doesn't reverse the order - it sorts the items. If that's > what you actually want, then my general dtdiff and sorting patch will > serve you better, as Grant suggests. > Yep, I concur your version is better and I would like to see that accepted for my own reasons. Cheers, Matthew _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
