On 11/15/2010 7:32 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 06:25:16PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang<w.s...@pengutronix.de>
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/pcm030.dts | 1 +
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/pcm032.dts | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/pcm030.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/pcm030.dts
index 8a4ec30..e7c36bc 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/pcm030.dts
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/pcm030.dts
@@ -259,6 +259,7 @@
eep...@52 {
compatible = "catalyst,24c32";
reg =<0x52>;
+ pagesize =<32>;
I think you'd better drop the pagesize property altogether, and
instead make the compatible string more specific (if needed at
all. are there any 'catalyst,24c32' chips with pagesize != 32?)
Microchip makes a 24c32 part that looks pretty similar to the catalyst
part, but Microchip's has a 64-byte page size compared to Catalyst's 32.
It would probably be feasible to have a generic I2C EEPROM driver that
could handle many different parts, parameterized by total size, block
size, and page size.
Thanks,
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
