On 01/03/2011 08:05 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 12/30/2010 12:58 PM, Grant Likely wrote: >> >> Right, but in all of those cases a boot wrapper provides the same >> functionality with better flexability, such as being able to provided >> the dtb image(s) at install time instead of compile time. >> > > Assuming the boot wrapper is written correctly. I have seen a number of > cases in which it was not, and it being "already locked into firmware" > and not changeable. > > It's a nice theory. And in theory, theory and practice agree. >
By the way, this is the same reason we also allow the initramfs and even the command line to be compiled in. -hpa _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss