On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:14:53 -0600 Yoder Stuart-B08248 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:18 PM > > To: Yoder Stuart-B08248 > > Cc: [email protected]; devicetree-discuss > > Subject: Re: [Power.org:parch] ePAPR 1.1 to do list > > > > On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:34:44 -0700 > > Yoder Stuart-B08248 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I've consolidated what I am aware of with respect to errors found in > > > 1.0, clarifications needed, and new mechanisms to go into ePAPR 1.1 > > > into a single list. > > > > > > Let me know if you are aware of anything else. > > > > > > ePAPR 1.1 To Do > > > --------------- > > > > > > 1. Fix typos, misc cleanup > > > > > > -device_type="simple-bus" in 8572 soc node example (p.96) > > > -p.51, line 27-- ET_EXEC is 0x2 not 0x1 > > > -p.41, broken cross reference > > > -missing period on virtual reg on ns16550 > > > > 2.3.11 says device_type should only be present for cpu and memory nodes, > > but the example trees in the appendices contain device_type = "serial", > > "network", "pci", and "open-pic" (as well as the simple-bus error mentioned > > above). > > Note-- the upstream device tree still has those device_type properties. > Should we still remove them from the example? How about we remove them from upstream, and fix any code that relies on it? -Scott _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
