On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Shawn Guo <shawn....@linaro.org> wrote: > Here is what I copied from booting-without-of.txt. > > ===== > f) the /soc<SOCname> node > > This node is used to represent a system-on-a-chip (SoC) and must be > present if the processor is a SoC. The top-level soc node contains > information that is global to all devices on the SoC. The node name > should contain a unit address for the SoC, which is the base address > of the memory-mapped register set for the SoC. The name of an SoC > node should start with "soc", and the remainder of the name should > represent the part number for the soc. For example, the MPC8540's > soc node would be called "soc8540". > > Required properties: > > - ranges : Should be defined as specified in 1) to describe the > translation of SoC addresses for memory mapped SoC registers. > - bus-frequency: Contains the bus frequency for the SoC node. > Typically, the value of this field is filled in by the boot > loader. > - compatible : Exact model of the SoC > > > Recommended properties: > > - reg : This property defines the address and size of the > memory-mapped registers that are used for the SOC node itself. > It does not include the child device registers - these will be > defined inside each child node. The address specified in the > "reg" property should match the unit address of the SOC node. > - #address-cells : Address representation for "soc" devices. The > format of this field may vary depending on whether or not the > device registers are memory mapped. For memory mapped > registers, this field represents the number of cells needed to > represent the address of the registers. For SOCs that do not > use MMIO, a special address format should be defined that > contains enough cells to represent the required information. > See 1) above for more details on defining #address-cells. > - #size-cells : Size representation for "soc" devices > - #interrupt-cells : Defines the width of cells used to represent > interrupts. Typically this value is <2>, which includes a > 32-bit number that represents the interrupt number, and a > 32-bit number that represents the interrupt sense and level. > This field is only needed if the SOC contains an interrupt > controller. > > The SOC node may contain child nodes for each SOC device that the > platform uses. Nodes should not be created for devices which exist > on the SOC but are not used by a particular platform. See chapter VI > for more information on how to specify devices that are part of a SOC. > > Example SOC node for the MPC8540: > > soc8540@e0000000 { > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <1>; > #interrupt-cells = <2>; > device_type = "soc"; > ranges = <00000000 e0000000 00100000> > reg = <e0000000 00003000>; > bus-frequency = <0>; > } > ===== > > I'm seeing the babbage.dts defined "soc" so differently than the > document requires. > >> + soc { >> + #address-cells = <0x1>; >> + #size-cells = <0x1>; >> + device_type = "soc"; >> + compatible = "simple-bus"; >> + ranges = <0x0 0x0 0xffffffff>; >> + >> + tzic { >> + #address-cells = <0x0>; >> + #interrupt-cells = <0x1>; >> + interrupt-controller; >> + reg = <0xe0000000 0x1000>; >> + compatible = "fsl,tzic"; >> + device_type = "tzic"; >> + phandle = <0x1>; >> + }; >> + }; >
The document is a little out of date in that it doesn't reflect all of the current best practices. It does need to be updated, but I'll respond to the specific questions here... > * The soc node name has neither part number nor base address Part number isn't necessary because the 'compatible' property is supposed to be used to identify the exact device. Base address must be part of any node that has a 'reg' property. In this particular example, neither is the case so it is okay. > * Even required property "bus-frequency" is missing bus-frequency isn't required. > * The document "Appendix A - Sample SOC node for MPC8540" defines > every device node under "soc", while babbage.dts has most devices > outside the "soc" node. The 'soc' node thing was something we started when new PowerPC SoC machines were created. However, it doesn't necessarily reflect the best practice. Ideally, the dt structure will match the physical structure of the chip. So, if a chip has multiple internal busses, then the dts should probably have a node for each bus, and then each device a child of the bus node. However, having a single containing 'soc' node for all on-chip busses and devices is probably a good thing to preserve. > > Are what the document describes requirements we must follow or just > suggestions we can take or not? Crafting a .dts file and device tree bindings are as much an art as a science. There are some things that aren't hard rules, but there are reasons behind why most are done in a certain way. The best way to develop a new .dts file is to draft up your best effort, post it for review, and listen to the comments that come back. :-) > > Besides the overall question above, some nitpicking embedded below ... > > On 18 February 2011 16:12, Jason Liu <r64...@freescale.com> wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu <r64...@freescale.com> >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts | 117 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..7ee26f1 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts >> @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ >> +/dts-v1/; >> + >> +/ { >> + model = "mx51_babbage"; This is a human readable string. You can write something like "Freescale i.MX51 Babbage" here. >> + compatible = "fsl,mx51_babbage"; Use dash '-' instead of underscores '_' in compatible values. >> + #address-cells = <0x1>; >> + #size-cells = <0x1>; >> + #interrupt-cells = <0x1>; >> + interrupt-parent = <0x1>; >> + >> + memory { >> + device_type = "memory"; >> + reg = <0x90000000 0x20000000>; >> + }; >> + >> + chosen { >> + bootargs = "console=ttymxc1,115200n8 debug earlyprintk"; >> + }; >> + >> + soc { >> + #address-cells = <0x1>; >> + #size-cells = <0x1>; >> + device_type = "soc"; Drop the "device_type" property. It only makes sense for machines with real Open Firmware. >> + compatible = "simple-bus"; Need to specify the specific chip here: compatible = "fsl,imx51-soc", "simple-bus"; >> + ranges = <0x0 0x0 0xffffffff>; one-to-one mapping of the full address range can be specified simply with an empty ranges property: ranges; >> + >> + tzic { tzic@e0000000 { >> + #address-cells = <0x0>; >> + #interrupt-cells = <0x1>; >> + interrupt-controller; >> + reg = <0xe0000000 0x1000>; >> + compatible = "fsl,tzic"; Specify the exact chip in the compatible property: compatible = "fsl,imx51-tzic"; >> + device_type = "tzic"; Drop device type >> + phandle = <0x1>; Drop phandle; dtc adds phandles automatically. >> + }; >> + }; >> + >> + clocks { >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <0>; >> + > > Can we use hex value here to keep the consistency throughout the file? For #address-cells and #size-cells use decimal integers. > >> + uart_clk0: uart@0 { @0 should only be specified if the node has a 'reg = <0>' property. In this case it doesn't so either 'reg' should be added, or '@0' should be removed. >> + compatible = "clock"; >> + clock-outputs = "imx-uart.0"; >> + }; >> + >> + uart_clk1: uart@1{ > > Can we put a space before "{" to keep the consistency throughout the file? Yes, please. > >> + compatible = "clock"; >> + clock-outputs = "imx-uart.1"; >> + }; >> + >> + uart_clk2: uart@2{ > > ditto > >> + compatible = "clock"; >> + clock-outputs = "imx-uart.2"; >> + }; >> + >> + fec_clk: @0{ "@0" is not a valid node name. > > ditto > >> + compatible = "clock"; >> + clock-outputs = "fec.0"; >> + }; >> + }; >> + >> + spba@70000000 { >> + #address-cells = <0x1>; >> + #size-cells = <0x1>; >> + device_type = "soc"; Drop device type. >> + compatible = "simple-bus"; Specify the actual device here before "simple-bus" >> + ranges = <0x0 0x70000000 0x100000>; >> + >> + imx-uart@C000 { > > Use lowercase for all address/offset to keep consistency throughout the file? yes. > >> + compatible = "imx-uart"; >> + reg = <0xc000 0x1000>; >> + interrupts = <0x21>; >> + rts-cts; >> + uart-clock = < &uart_clk2 >, "uart"; > > Remove the space after "<" and before ">" to keep consistency > throughout the file? > >> + }; >> + }; >> + >> + aips@73f00000 { >> + #address-cells = <0x1>; >> + #size-cells = <0x1>; >> + device_type = "soc"; >> + compatible = "simple-bus"; >> + ranges = <0x0 0x73f00000 0x100000>; >> + >> + imx-uart@BC000 { > > ditto > >> + compatible = "imx-uart"; >> + reg = <0xbc000 0x1000>; >> + interrupts = <0x1f>; >> + rts-cts; >> + uart-clock = < &uart_clk0 >, "uart"; > > Remove the space after "<" and before ">"? > >> + }; >> + >> + imx-uart@C0000 { > > Lowercase for offset? > >> + compatible = "imx-uart"; >> + reg = <0xc0000 0x1000>; >> + interrupts = <0x20>; >> + rts-cts; >> + uart-clock = <&uart_clk1>, "uart"; >> + }; >> + }; >> + >> + aips@83f00000 { >> + #address-cells = <0x1>; >> + #size-cells = <0x1>; >> + device_type = "soc"; >> + compatible = "simple-bus"; >> + ranges = <0x0 0x83f00000 0x100000>; >> + >> + fec@EC000 { > > ditto > >> + compatible = "fec"; >> + reg = <0xec000 0x1000>; >> + interrupts = <0x57>; >> + fec_clk-clock = < &fec_clk >, "fec"; >> + }; >> + }; >> +}; >> -- >> 1.7.0.4 >> > > -- > Regards, > Shawn > > _______________________________________________ > linaro-dev mailing list > linaro-...@lists.linaro.org > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev > -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss