Hi, Shawn, On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Shawn Guo <shawn....@freescale.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 03:33:24PM +0800, Jason Hui wrote: >> Hi, Shawn, [...] >> >> No, I don't think so. Where the section is put is not one strict rule, >> take a look at >> powerpc dts file, you will see that. >> > Maybe I did not make my point clear. I would try it one more time. > Let's see this virtual example. > [...] >> I don't see what's wrong with eCSPI and SSI when put spba behind aips >> just like uart. > > Sorry. Allow me correct the point here. eCSPI is not the example I > intended to put. Let's see SSI below. You do not get the correct > order anyway, either you put spba@70000000 before or after > aips@83f00000, unless you split the aips@83f00000 section into > mulitples, which again I'm not sure if we should go for. > [...] > It does not matter at all whether you take my comments or not. The > thing matters is if we have the solution working for all the possible > cases.
I know your meanings from the beginning. The case is that, There always will be solution for this case. I will adjust it when I met such issue in-deed. for example when adding SSI support at that time. I don't want to make things complex here for the basic DT support. BR, Jason. > > -- > Regards, > Shawn > > _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
