On Thursday 15 September 2011 07:16 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:52:00PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
+Required properties:
+- compatible: Must be "regulator","ti,twl-reg";
I'd expect listings for the specific chips too.
I just did'nt do that because we have just one driver for
all twl chips (twl4030/twl6030/twl6025) and there seems to be
no real need to identify specific chips while we could
do knowing just the chip family.
+ xyz-regulator: regulator@0 {
+ compatible = "regulator","ti,twl-reg";
+ ti,reg-id =<37>; /* TWL6030_REG_VAUX1_6030 */
These magic numbers are *very* Linux specific, we should have a better
way of specifying regulators - I'd off the top of my head expect that
the compatible property would identify the regulator.
The driver seems to use a per-regulator table, and it uses the above
id to indexed into it. I could probably do it with the compatible
property, but that would mean I have a compatible for *each* regulator
instance, like "ti,twl-reg-vaux1", "ti,twl-reg-vmmc" etc.
Does that sound reasonable?
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
