On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 17:20 -0800, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 03:58:04PM -0800, Rhyland Klein wrote: > [...] > > -static const struct i2c_device_id bq20z75_id[] = { > > - { "bq20z75", 0 }, > > +static const struct i2c_device_id sbs_id[] = { > > + { "sbs-battery", 0 }, > > You have to leave "bq20z75" here as is, and add "sbs-battery" as an > additional device id. > > The reason is that older device trees might already have compatible > = "bq20z75", without specifying "sbs-battery". > > Thanks! >
Good thought! I had thought about that at some point but apparently not when actually working on the patch. Will do in v2. -rhyland _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss