On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 03:44:59AM +0000, Dong Aisheng-B29396 wrote: ... > > > The real problem is do we need to support individual pin mux Or still > > > using virtual pin group? > > > For the way Stephen proposed, we can only support individual pin mux > > > Since IMX pins are not grouped together in HW. > > > > > I do not see any problem here. If you look at the first column of 'mux' > > property of node pinmux-usdhc1, it is a group of pins for usdhc1. > > Isn't it one virtual pin group for usdhc1? > > > If we treat the whole pins in 'mux' property as a group, > There may be potential inconsistent issue since Tegra will treat each > One in the list of 'mux' as a group. > And it would be a problem for pinctrl core to parse it in a standard way. > Based on my understanding, the 'group' given by 'mux' property may be a group of pin/group defined by hardware, or mixing of the two.
-- Regards, Shawn _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
