On 02/21/2012 03:07 PM, Rob Herring :
> On 02/17/2012 03:27 AM, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Both AIC and GPIO controllers are now using the standard of_irq_init()
>> function to initialize IRQs in case of DT use.
>> The DT specific initialization functions are now separated from the
>> non-DT case and are now using "linear" irq domains.
>> The .map() irqdomain operation is responsible for positioning the IRQ
>> handlers. In AIC case, the Linux IRQ number is directly programmed in
>> the hardware to avoid an additional reverse mapping operation.
>> The AIC position its irq domain as the "default" irq domain.
>>
>> For DT case, the priority is not yet filled in the SMR. It will be the
>> subject of another patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch goes on top of previous series:
>> "[PATCH 0/9] ARM: at91: irqdomain and device tree for AIC and GPIO"
>> (which goes on top of Grant's "irq_domain generalization and rework").
>>
>> It should address all advices by Rob Herring and I hope it is the best
>> way to deal with irq domains in all DT/non-DT cases.
>>
>> A simple concern is that the IRQ latency may be bigger because of the
>> irq_create_mapping() call in .to_irq(). This is called in the hot path
>> of GPIO IRQ handler...
> 
> 
> Why are you not using irq_find_mapping?

Hehe, good question ;-)
It should have been experimented at some point and forgotten... But you
are absolutely right, it is the way to go.

>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>>  arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt.c |   11 +++-
>>  arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h  |    6 ++
>>  arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c     |  124 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>  arch/arm/mach-at91/irq.c      |   92 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>  4 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt.c
>> index 6120978..e0df4e5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt.c
>> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
>>  #include <linux/init.h>
>>  #include <linux/module.h>
>>  #include <linux/gpio.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
>>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>>  
>>  #include <mach/hardware.h>
>> @@ -86,9 +88,16 @@ static void __init ek_add_device_nand(void)
>>      at91_add_device_nand(&ek_nand_data);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static const struct of_device_id irq_of_match[] __initconst = {
>> +
>> +    { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-aic", .data = at91_aic_of_init },
>> +    { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-gpio", .data = at91_gpio_of_irq_setup 
>> },
>> +    { /*sentinel*/ }
>> +};
>> +
>>  static void __init at91_dt_init_irq(void)
>>  {
>> -    at91_init_irq_default();
>> +    of_irq_init(irq_of_match);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void __init at91_dt_device_init(void)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h b/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h
>> index 78cd605..c5d16e5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>   */
>>  
>>  #include <linux/clkdev.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>>  
>>   /* Map io */
>>  extern void __init at91_map_io(void);
>> @@ -25,6 +26,9 @@ extern void __init at91_init_irq_default(void);
>>  extern void __init at91_init_interrupts(unsigned int priority[]);
>>  extern void __init at91x40_init_interrupts(unsigned int priority[]);
>>  extern void __init at91_aic_init(unsigned int priority[]);
>> +extern int  __init at91_aic_of_init(struct device_node *node,
>> +                                struct device_node *parent);
>> +
>>  
>>   /* Timer */
>>  struct sys_timer;
>> @@ -75,5 +79,7 @@ struct at91_gpio_bank {
>>  };
>>  extern void __init at91_gpio_init(struct at91_gpio_bank *, int nr_banks);
>>  extern void __init at91_gpio_irq_setup(void);
>> +extern int  __init at91_gpio_of_irq_setup(struct device_node *node,
>> +                                      struct device_node *parent);
>>  
>>  extern int at91_extern_irq;
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c
>> index fbcb47e..64395a5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c
>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
>>  #include <linux/of_irq.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
>>  
>>  #include <mach/hardware.h>
>>  #include <mach/at91_pio.h>
>> @@ -37,6 +38,7 @@ struct at91_gpio_chip {
>>      struct gpio_chip        chip;
>>      struct at91_gpio_chip   *next;          /* Bank sharing same clock */
>>      int                     pioc_hwirq;     /* PIO bank interrupt 
>> identifier on AIC */
>> +    int                     pioc_virq;      /* PIO bank Linux virtual 
>> interrupt */
>>      int                     pioc_idx;       /* PIO bank index */
>>      void __iomem            *regbase;       /* PIO bank virtual address */
>>      struct clk              *clock;         /* associated clock */
>> @@ -295,7 +297,7 @@ static int gpio_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, 
>> unsigned state)
>>      else
>>              wakeups[bank] &= ~mask;
>>  
>> -    irq_set_irq_wake(gpio_chip[bank].pioc_hwirq, state);
>> +    irq_set_irq_wake(at91_gpio->pioc_virq, state);
>>  
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>> @@ -397,12 +399,12 @@ static struct irq_chip gpio_irqchip = {
>>  
>>  static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
>>  {
>> -    unsigned        virq;
>>      struct irq_data *idata = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
>>      struct irq_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(idata);
>>      struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(idata);
>>      void __iomem    *pio = at91_gpio->regbase;
>> -    u32             isr;
>> +    unsigned long   isr;
>> +    int             n;
>>  
>>      /* temporarily mask (level sensitive) parent IRQ */
>>      chip->irq_ack(idata);
>> @@ -420,13 +422,10 @@ static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned irq, struct 
>> irq_desc *desc)
>>                      continue;
>>              }
>>  
>> -            virq = gpio_to_irq(at91_gpio->chip.base);
>> -
>> -            while (isr) {
>> -                    if (isr & 1)
>> -                            generic_handle_irq(virq);
>> -                    virq++;
>> -                    isr >>= 1;
>> +            n = find_first_bit(&isr, BITS_PER_LONG);
>> +            while (n < BITS_PER_LONG) {
>> +                    
>> generic_handle_irq(at91_gpiolib_to_irq(&at91_gpio->chip, n));
>> +                    n = find_next_bit(&isr, BITS_PER_LONG, n + 1);
>>              }
>>      }
>>      chip->irq_unmask(idata);
>> @@ -496,23 +495,91 @@ postcore_initcall(at91_gpio_debugfs_init);
>>  
>> /*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
>>  
>>  /*
>> + * This lock class tells lockdep that GPIO irqs are in a different
>> + * category than their parents, so it won't report false recursion.
>> + */
>> +static struct lock_class_key gpio_lock_class;
>> +
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
>> +static int at91_gpio_irq_map(struct irq_domain *h, unsigned int virq,
>> +                                                    irq_hw_number_t hw)
>> +{
>> +    struct at91_gpio_chip   *at91_gpio = h->host_data;
>> +
>> +    irq_set_lockdep_class(virq, &gpio_lock_class);
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * Can use the "simple" and not "edge" handler since it's
>> +     * shorter, and the AIC handles interrupts sanely.
>> +     */
>> +    irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &gpio_irqchip,
>> +                             handle_simple_irq);
>> +    set_irq_flags(virq, IRQF_VALID);
>> +    irq_set_chip_data(virq, at91_gpio);
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct irq_domain_ops at91_gpio_ops = {
>> +    .map    = at91_gpio_irq_map,
>> +    .xlate  = irq_domain_xlate_twocell,
>> +};
>> +
>> +int __init at91_gpio_of_irq_setup(struct device_node *node,
>> +                                 struct device_node *parent)
>> +{
>> +    struct at91_gpio_chip   *prev = NULL;
>> +    int                     alias_idx = of_alias_get_id(node, "gpio");
>> +    struct at91_gpio_chip   *at91_gpio = &gpio_chip[alias_idx];
>> +
>> +    /* Disable irqs of this PIO controller */
>> +    __raw_writel(~0, at91_gpio->regbase + PIO_IDR);
>> +
>> +    /* Setup irq domain */
>> +    at91_gpio->domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, at91_gpio->chip.ngpio,
>> +                                            &at91_gpio_ops, at91_gpio);
>> +    if (!at91_gpio->domain)
>> +            panic("at91_gpio.%d: couldn't allocate irq domain (DT).\n",
>> +                    at91_gpio->pioc_idx);
>> +
>> +    /* Setup chained handler */
>> +    if (at91_gpio->pioc_idx)
>> +            prev = &gpio_chip[at91_gpio->pioc_idx - 1];
>> +
>> +    /* The toplevel handler handles one bank of GPIOs, except
>> +     * on some SoC it can handles up to three...
>> +     * We only set up the handler for the first of the list.
>> +     */
>> +    if (prev && prev->next == at91_gpio)
>> +            return 0;
>> +
>> +    at91_gpio->pioc_virq = irq_create_mapping(irq_find_host(parent),
>> +                                                    at91_gpio->pioc_hwirq);
>> +    irq_set_chip_data(at91_gpio->pioc_virq, at91_gpio);
>> +    irq_set_chained_handler(at91_gpio->pioc_virq, gpio_irq_handler);
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +int __init at91_gpio_of_irq_setup(struct device_node *node,
>> +                                 struct device_node *parent)
>> +{
>> +    return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +/*
>>   * irqdomain initialization: pile up irqdomains on top of AIC range
>>   */
>>  static void __init at91_gpio_irqdomain(struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio)
>>  {
>>      int irq_base;
>> -#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
>> -    struct device_node *of_node = at91_gpio->chip.of_node;
>> -#else
>> -    struct device_node *of_node = NULL;
>> -#endif
>>  
>>      irq_base = irq_alloc_descs(-1, 0, at91_gpio->chip.ngpio, 0);
>>      if (irq_base < 0)
>>              panic("at91_gpio.%d: error %d: couldn't allocate IRQ 
>> numbers.\n",
>>                      at91_gpio->pioc_idx, irq_base);
>> -    at91_gpio->domain = irq_domain_add_legacy(of_node,
>> -                                              at91_gpio->chip.ngpio,
>> +    at91_gpio->domain = irq_domain_add_legacy(NULL, at91_gpio->chip.ngpio,
>>                                                irq_base, 0,
>>                                                &irq_domain_simple_ops, NULL);
>>      if (!at91_gpio->domain)
>> @@ -521,12 +588,6 @@ static void __init at91_gpio_irqdomain(struct 
>> at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio)
>>  }
>>  
>>  /*
>> - * This lock class tells lockdep that GPIO irqs are in a different
>> - * category than their parents, so it won't report false recursion.
>> - */
>> -static struct lock_class_key gpio_lock_class;
>> -
>> -/*
>>   * Called from the processor-specific init to enable GPIO interrupt support.
>>   */
>>  void __init at91_gpio_irq_setup(void)
>> @@ -538,8 +599,7 @@ void __init at91_gpio_irq_setup(void)
>>      for (pioc = 0, this = gpio_chip, prev = NULL;
>>                      pioc++ < gpio_banks;
>>                      prev = this, this++) {
>> -            unsigned        pioc_hwirq = this->pioc_hwirq;
>> -            int             offset;
>> +            int offset;
>>  
>>              __raw_writel(~0, this->regbase + PIO_IDR);
>>  
>> @@ -547,7 +607,7 @@ void __init at91_gpio_irq_setup(void)
>>              at91_gpio_irqdomain(this);
>>  
>>              for (offset = 0; offset < this->chip.ngpio; offset++) {
>> -                    unsigned int virq = irq_find_mapping(this->domain, 
>> offset);
>> +                    unsigned int virq = irq_create_mapping(this->domain, 
>> offset);
> 
> This should get done by irq_domain_add_legacy.

Yes, I revert this to irq_find_mapping().


>>                      irq_set_lockdep_class(virq, &gpio_lock_class);
>>  
>>                      /*
>> @@ -569,8 +629,9 @@ void __init at91_gpio_irq_setup(void)
>>              if (prev && prev->next == this)
>>                      continue;
>>  
>> -            irq_set_chip_data(pioc_hwirq, this);
>> -            irq_set_chained_handler(pioc_hwirq, gpio_irq_handler);
>> +            this->pioc_virq = irq_create_mapping(NULL, this->pioc_hwirq);
>> +            irq_set_chip_data(this->pioc_virq, this);
>> +            irq_set_chained_handler(this->pioc_virq, gpio_irq_handler);
>>      }
>>      pr_info("AT91: %d gpio irqs in %d banks\n", gpio_irqnbr, gpio_banks);
>>  }
>> @@ -648,7 +709,12 @@ static void at91_gpiolib_dbg_show(struct seq_file *s, 
>> struct gpio_chip *chip)
>>  static int at91_gpiolib_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
>>  {
>>      struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio = to_at91_gpio_chip(chip);
>> -    int virq = irq_find_mapping(at91_gpio->domain, offset);
>> +    int virq;
>> +
>> +    if (offset < chip->ngpio)
>> +            virq = irq_create_mapping(at91_gpio->domain, offset);
>> +    else
>> +            virq = -ENXIO;
>>  
>>      dev_dbg(chip->dev, "%s: request IRQ for GPIO %d, return %d\n",
>>                              chip->label, offset + chip->base, virq);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/irq.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/irq.c
>> index 46682fa..2e4ee09 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/irq.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/irq.c
>> @@ -135,27 +135,72 @@ static struct irq_chip at91_aic_chip = {
>>      .irq_set_wake   = at91_aic_set_wake,
>>  };
>>  
>> +static void __init at91_aic_hw_init(unsigned int spu_vector)
>> +{
>> +    int i;
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * Perform 8 End Of Interrupt Command to make sure AIC
>> +     * will not Lock out nIRQ
>> +     */
>> +    for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
>> +            at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_EOICR, 0);
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * Spurious Interrupt ID in Spurious Vector Register.
>> +     * When there is no current interrupt, the IRQ Vector Register
>> +     * reads the value stored in AIC_SPU
>> +     */
>> +    at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_SPU, spu_vector);
>> +
>> +    /* No debugging in AIC: Debug (Protect) Control Register */
>> +    at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_DCR, 0);
>> +
>> +    /* Disable and clear all interrupts initially */
>> +    at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_IDCR, 0xFFFFFFFF);
>> +    at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_ICCR, 0xFFFFFFFF);
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> +
> 
> Remove extra blank lines.

Sure, done.

>>  #if defined(CONFIG_OF)
>> -static int __init __at91_aic_of_init(struct device_node *node,
>> -                                 struct device_node *parent)
>> +static int at91_aic_irq_map(struct irq_domain *h, unsigned int virq,
>> +                                                    irq_hw_number_t hw)
>>  {
>> -    at91_aic_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
>> -    at91_aic_np = node;
>> +    /* Put virq number in Source Vector Register */
>> +    at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_SVR(hw), virq);
>> +
>> +    /* Active Low interrupt, without priority */
>> +    at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_SMR(hw), AT91_AIC_SRCTYPE_LOW);
>> +
>> +    irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &at91_aic_chip, handle_level_irq);
>> +    set_irq_flags(virq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
>>  
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static const struct of_device_id aic_ids[] __initconst = {
>> -    { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-aic", .data = __at91_aic_of_init },
>> -    { /*sentinel*/ }
>> +static struct irq_domain_ops at91_aic_irq_ops = {
>> +    .map    = at91_aic_irq_map,
>> +    .xlate  = irq_domain_xlate_twocell,
>>  };
>>  
>> -static void __init at91_aic_of_init(void)
>> +int __init at91_aic_of_init(struct device_node *node,
>> +                                 struct device_node *parent)
>>  {
>> -    of_irq_init(aic_ids);
>> +    at91_aic_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
>> +    at91_aic_np = node;
>> +
>> +    at91_aic_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(at91_aic_np, NR_AIC_IRQS,
>> +                                            &at91_aic_irq_ops, NULL);
>> +    if (!at91_aic_domain)
>> +            panic("Unable to add AIC irq domain (DT)\n");
>> +
>> +    irq_set_default_host(at91_aic_domain);
> 
> Is this really necessary? I don't think it should be.

Well, it allows me to retreive the IRQ controller domain from the gpio
driver.
Cf. at91_gpio_irq_setup() with the call to
irq_create_mapping(NULL, xxx) just above.

Is there a better way to do this?
(it seems that irq_find_host() is dedicated to the device tree enabled
configuration).

>> +    at91_aic_hw_init(NR_AIC_IRQS);
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>>  }
>> -#else
>> -static void __init at91_aic_of_init(void) {}
>>  #endif
>>  
>>  /*
>> @@ -166,11 +211,7 @@ void __init at91_aic_init(unsigned int 
>> priority[NR_AIC_IRQS])
>>      unsigned int i;
>>      int irq_base;
>>  
>> -    if (of_have_populated_dt())
>> -            at91_aic_of_init();
>> -    else
>> -            at91_aic_base = ioremap(AT91_AIC, 512);
>> -
>> +    at91_aic_base = ioremap(AT91_AIC, 512);
>>      if (!at91_aic_base)
>>              panic("Unable to ioremap AIC registers\n");
>>  
>> @@ -187,6 +228,8 @@ void __init at91_aic_init(unsigned int 
>> priority[NR_AIC_IRQS])
>>      if (!at91_aic_domain)
>>              panic("Unable to add AIC irq domain\n");
>>  
>> +    irq_set_default_host(at91_aic_domain);
>> +
>>      /*
>>       * The IVR is used by macro get_irqnr_and_base to read and verify.
>>       * The irq number is NR_AIC_IRQS when a spurious interrupt has occurred.
>> @@ -199,22 +242,7 @@ void __init at91_aic_init(unsigned int 
>> priority[NR_AIC_IRQS])
>>  
>>              irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, &at91_aic_chip, handle_level_irq);
>>              set_irq_flags(i, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
>> -
>> -            /* Perform 8 End Of Interrupt Command to make sure AIC will not 
>> Lock out nIRQ */
>> -            if (i < 8)
>> -                    at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_EOICR, 0);
>>      }
>>  
>> -    /*
>> -     * Spurious Interrupt ID in Spurious Vector Register is NR_AIC_IRQS
>> -     * When there is no current interrupt, the IRQ Vector Register reads 
>> the value stored in AIC_SPU
>> -     */
>> -    at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_SPU, NR_AIC_IRQS);
>> -
>> -    /* No debugging in AIC: Debug (Protect) Control Register */
>> -    at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_DCR, 0);
>> -
>> -    /* Disable and clear all interrupts initially */
>> -    at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_IDCR, 0xFFFFFFFF);
>> -    at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_ICCR, 0xFFFFFFFF);
>> +    at91_aic_hw_init(NR_AIC_IRQS);
>>  }


Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to