* Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 23 February 2012, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > Is this only used for the device tree functions? If so, I would recommend > > > making it less generic and always search for a device node. > > > > It is currently only used to look up a struct pwm_chip for a given struct > > device_node, yes. But I can see other uses for this. For instance this could > > be useful if we ever want to provide an alternative way of requesting a PWM > > on a per-chip basis. > > Nah, just keep it simple for now. If we need it later, we can still > add something like this back, but for now it's just a source of > confusion and possible bugs.
Will do. > > I was again basically looking at gpiolib for inspiration (maybe I should > > stop > > doing that :-). Maybe gpiolib should be reworked to use seq_file's iterator > > interface as well? Just in case anybody else turns to gpiolib for > > inspiration. > > Good idea. Would you be able to send a patch for that, too? I would guess > converting both at the same time would be easier for you than splitting > the work between two people. I'll take a shot at it. It may take some time, though. Thierry
pgpQxTdYVvrxU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
