On 03/08/2012 07:51 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.red...@avionic-design.de>
Patch description?
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-harmony-pcie.c
> b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-harmony-pcie.c
...
> -static int __init harmony_pcie_init(void)
> +static int tegra_pcie_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
That name should probably still be called harmony_something() since it's
still board-specific.
I wonder how having a per-board callback will integrate with device
tree. I guess I'll find out when I review patch 11:-)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-trimslice.c
> b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-trimslice.c
> +static int __init trimslice_pci_init(void)
> {
> if (!machine_is_trimslice())
> return 0;
You can remove that test now.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board.h b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board.h
> +#define TEGRA_PCIE_MAX_PORTS 2
> +
> +struct tegra_pcie_pdata {
> + int (*init)(struct platform_device *pdev);
> + int (*exit)(struct platform_device *pdev);
> + bool enable_ports[TEGRA_PCIE_MAX_PORTS];
> +};
That's a somewhat odd place to put the header; a dedicated
mach-tegra/include/mach/tegra_pcie_pdata.h or
include/linux/platform_data/tegra_pcie.h might make more sense.
Aside from those pretty minor issues, this all looks great. Thanks for
fixing our driver!
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
