On 03/14/2012 08:46 AM, David Gibson wrote: > So, in order to actually make progress on the dtc expressions / macros > / whatnot stuff, I really think I should dust off my integer (constant) > expressions patch, and we can apply that. > > While we still have disagreements on a bunch of stuff here, I think > we're at least agreed on what integer expressions should look like. > And even if we change approaches later (e.g. to your ifs and fors in > dtc approach) the integer expression syntax won't change, only the > implementation.
I'd love to see something like that. I've don't think I've actually looked through your patches for that yet; I briefly looked at Jon's since they're in a branch in the dtc repo, but I don't think I managed to track down the patches you sent for this. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
