On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 08:18:27PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 16 March 2012, Jason Cooper wrote: > > > > This series continues the process of converting all of the drivers > > initialized > > from kirkwood_init() to devicetree. > > > > The first three patches are code cleanup from Andrew Lunn and myself. > > > > The next three patches are cleanup and prep to facilitate adding new boards > > during the transition to devicetree. > > > > The next patch moves the uarts into the bus for all kirkwood boards and > > leaves > > enabling them and specifying clock-frequency up to the board file. > > > > The rest of the series is the initial conversion of rtc-mv to devicetree > > since > > it doesn't use tclk or pinmux. These should be safe to merge as they won't > > interfere with the clk/clkdev work Andrew Lunn is working on. > > > > > > Please be aware that this is a complete reshuffle of the whole series and is > > based purely against arm-soc/next/boards. > > Is this a pull request for v3.4 or not?
I was going to give it a day or two more, and if no one brought up anything earth-shattering, I was going to submit the pull-request for this series on Sunday. I can do it now if you think it's ok. > I'm willing to take it and have put it into next/dt2 for now so it > makes it into linux-next. I'm not taking a newer version for v3.4 any > more, so if anyone has concerns over some of your patches in the > series, it all gets removed again and we will have to postpone them > until v3.5. The problematic patch (sata_mv) has been removed. So, there should be no issue. > Note that it would have been better to base your series on top of just > the kirkwood/board branch rather than all of next/boards, but it's not > a big deal. Ok. thx, Jason. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss