On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 01:08:29PM -0700, David Brown wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 01:23:46PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > > On 04/05/2012 12:15 PM, David Brown wrote: > > > Some MSM SoCs have a small serial-type "bus" that is used to > > > communicate with the PMIC devices. This interface is always > > > point-to-point. I'm doing a device-tree conversion of the driver that > > > Ken Heitke posted last year <https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/17/503>. > > > > > > A naive conversion to device tree, would result in something like > > > this: > > > > > > qcom,ssbi@500000 { > > > compatible = "qcom,ssbi"; > > > reg = <0x500000 0x1000>; > > > qcom,controller-type = "ssbi"; > > > > > > qcom,pmic8058@0 { > > > reg = <0x0 0x01>; > > > ... > > > } > > > } > > > > > > There would end up being an extraneous register for the device on the > > > other end (there are no addresses), and there would need to be code in > > > the ssbi driver to traverse this small tree to find these nodes. > > > > Isn't that extra code simply: > > > > of_platform_populate(pdev->dev.of_node, NULL, NULL, &pdev->dev); > > > > That seems like pretty low overhead. > > True, but it still bothers me to have to have a bogus register.
Ok, not sure where I got that idea, but I don't appear to actually need a register in the pmic8058 node for of_platform_populate to create a platform device. It only needs a compatible field. So, it look like that matches just what I need. Thanks, David -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
