On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 01:09:20PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 04/12/2012 11:14 PM, David Daney wrote: > > From: David Daney <david.da...@cavium.com> > > > > v3: Integrate changes from Lars-Peter Clausen to make better use of > > the of_*() infrastructure. Get rid of ugly #ifdefs. > > > > v2: Update bindings to use "reg" insutead of "cell-index" > > > > v1: Unchanged from the original RFC where I said: > > > > We need to populate our I2C devices from the device tree, but some > > of our systems have multiplexers which currently break this process. > > > > The basic idea is to have the generic i2c-mux framework propagate > > the device_node for the child bus into the corresponding > > i2c_adapter, and then call of_i2c_register_devices(). This means > > that the device tree bindings for *all* i2c muxes must have some > > common properties. I try to document these in mux.txt. > > > > This is now tested against 3.4-rc2 and is still working well. > > > > I've been using these patches with a pca9548 and a pca9546 for a while now. > Both: > > Tested-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <l...@metafoo.de>
Both applied to next, thanks to all involved. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
