Hi Rob, On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:28:22 -0500, Rob Herring <robherri...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 07/12/2012 04:47 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Dear Albert ARIBAUD, > > > > In message <20120712233801.0411daa7@lilith> you wrote: > >> > >> If I'm not mistaken, yes U-Boot loads itself as high as it can, and I don't > >> know about the FDT, but no, U-Boot does not "like" to load initrd "just > >> below that": it loads initrd where the boot commands tell it to, and the > >> boot commands are written by board developers. Nothing in U-Boot forces > >> initrd to be loaded as high as possible. > > u-boot loads the initrd where you tell it, then bootm relocates it for > some reason. > >> > >> That leaves the question of the FDT, though -- I'm not familiar enough > >> with it (yet) to tell if it is always located just under U-Boot or if > >> its placement is controllable by board commands. > > > > You can always just set the "fdt_high" and "initrd_high" evironment > > variables to restrict the positioning of initrd and FDT in RAM; see > > the README for details. > > Yes, I'm aware of all this, but this is not the default behavior and the > default behavior will not work in this case. It also has another bug > related to the relocation that I fixed: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg86475.html > > Rob
As for the default behavior, this becomes a board config issue, not a U-Boot issue. Regarding the patch, as a bugfix it will go in u-boot-arm/master for 2012.07. With all this, do we have the overall issue covered? Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
