On 7/26/2012 6:34 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 26-07-2012 12:36, Daniel Mack wrote:
>
>>>> Add Bosch D_CAN controller device tree data to AM33XX dtsi file
>>>> by adding d_can device node with all the necessary parameters.
>
>>>> Signed-off-by: AnilKumar Ch <anilku...@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi | 5 +++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
>>>> index 9b974dc..2db2ffb 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
>>>> @@ -163,5 +163,10 @@
>>>> #size-cells = <0>;
>>>> ti,hwmods = "i2c3";
>>>> };
>>>> +
>>>> + dcan1: d_can@481D0000 {
>>>
>>> Address postfix in the node name and no "reg" property?
>
>> This still works due to the hwmod mappings OMAP relies on.
>
> I.e. the "reg" property is populated in runtime?
>
>> I would still
>> put it there, so the switch to real DT definitions will be less painful.
>
> How it helps anything?
>
This is required field if you want to use "of_dev_auxdata", without
"reg" property OF layer fails to create dev_id (name) bindings with what
you have specified as part of "of_dev_auxdata".
And with respect to CAN driver, even though we are using hwmod, I would
want to create dev_id = d_can.0 and d_can.1. And this is only possible
if Address and compatible string matches.
So this field is important and required in this case.
Thanks,
Vaibhav
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
