Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote: >> >But assuming that this really is the best approach, then it would make >> >sense for --strip-disabled to leave this node in the dtb, because >> >otherwise there would be no way to re-enable it. > --strip-disabled should still get rid for nodes marked as failed > as-well, because fail means something serious and un-recoverable.
Well, I don't know if that's true. Does status=fail really mean unrecoverable? -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
