On 13/09/12 21:32, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 09/13/2012 06:10 AM, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
>> From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandaga...@st.com>
>>
>> This patch introduces of_get_child function to get a child node by its
>> name in a given parent node.
>>
>> Without this patch each driver code has to iterate the parent and do
>> a string compare, However having of_get_child libary function would
>> avoid code duplication, errors and is more convenient.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandaga...@st.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/of/base.c  |   27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/linux/of.h |    2 ++
>>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
>> index d4a1c9a..d4b6840 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
>> @@ -391,6 +391,33 @@ struct device_node *of_get_next_available_child(const 
>> struct device_node *node,
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_get_next_available_child);
>>  
>>  /**
>> + *  of_get_child - Find the child node by name for given parent
>> + *  @node:  parent node
>> + *  @name:  child name to look for.
>> + *
>> + *      This function looks for child node for given matching name
>> + *
>> + *  Returns a node pointer if found, with refcount incremented, use
>> + *  of_node_put() on it when done.
>> + *  else returns NULL.
>> + */
>> +
>> +struct device_node *of_get_child(const struct device_node *node,
> of_get_child_by_name would be more consistent naming with other apis.
I agree.
>> +                            const char *name)
>> +{
>> +    struct device_node *child;
>> +
>> +    read_lock(&devtree_lock);
> I don't think you need the lock here. The for_each takes the lock while
> finding the node.
yes, you are correct. We don't need a readlock here.

>> +    for_each_child_of_node(node, child)
>> +            if (child->name && (of_node_cmp(child->name, name) == 0)
>> +                    && of_node_get(child))
>> +                    break;
>> +    read_unlock(&devtree_lock);
>> +    return child;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_get_child);
>> +
>> +/**
>>   *  of_find_node_by_path - Find a node matching a full OF path
>>   *  @path:  The full path to match
>>   *
>> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
>> index 1b11632..510e1fe 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/of.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
>> @@ -192,6 +192,8 @@ extern struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const 
>> struct device_node *node,
>>                                           struct device_node *prev);
>>  extern struct device_node *of_get_next_available_child(
>>      const struct device_node *node, struct device_node *prev);
>> +extern struct device_node *of_get_child(const struct device_node *node,
>> +                                    const char *name);
>>  
>>  #define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
>>      for (child = of_get_next_child(parent, NULL); child != NULL; \
>>
>
>

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to