On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:34:21AM +0800, Bo Shen wrote: > On 11/1/2012 22:43, Mark Brown wrote: > >On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:26:59PM +0800, Bo Shen wrote:
> >>+dai: dai {
> >>+ compatible = "atmel,atmel-ssc-dai";
> >>+ atmel,dai-master = <&ssc0>;
> >>+};
> >This seems to be a purely virtual device which remaps the SSC onto the
> >Linux audio subsystem? If that is the case then it shouldn't appear in
> >the device tree,
> Yes. This is a purely virtual device. I add this as to the following reason.
> In our case, the ssc can connect to audio codec, DAC and other
> devices. In order to avoid duplicate the code, so keep ssc as a
> library, register it directly in Linux and use remap method to let
> it work onto other different subsystem.
Your quote appears to have deleted the bit of my mail where I told you
how to fix this. Is there something unclear in my suggestion that the
machine driver directly reference the SSC node?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
