On 11/13/2012 11:10 AM, Mitch Bradley wrote: > It seems to me that this capebus discussion is missing an important > point. The name capebus suggests that it is a bus, so there should be a > parent node to represent that bus. It should have a driver whose API > implements all of the system-interface functions a cape needs.
It was discussed earlier that capebus isn't actually a bus. It's simply a collection of a bunch of pins from the SoC hooked up to connectors. I'd agree that it's mis-named. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
