On 29.11.2012 13:36, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 22:28:59, Daniel Mack wrote:
> [...]
>> + if (!of_property_read_string(child, "ti,nand-ecc-opt", &s)) {
>> + for (val = 0; val < ARRAY_SIZE(nand_ecc_opts); val++)
>> + if (!strcasecmp(s, nand_ecc_opts[val])) {
>> + gpmc_nand_data->ecc_opt = val;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * AM335x RBL compatibility mode - dependns on runtime
>> + * detection of the error location module.
>> + */
>> + if (!strcasecmp(s, "bch8-am335xrbl-compatible")) {
>> + gpmc_nand_data->ecc_opt = OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW;
>> + gpmc_nand_data->is_elm_used = true;
>
> Remove is_elm_used from struct omap_nand_platform_data. Now this data
> populated as part of run time detection of elm module. So please remove
> The usage of is_elm_used;
So why do we need "bch8-am335xrbl-compatible" as special case then?
I thought the whole idea here is to tell the driver we want bch8 *and*
the usage of the elm, instead of falling back to the (incompatible)
software mode? If I remove that assignment, "bch8-am335xrbl-compatible"
is the same than "bch8".
Which detail am I missing? :)
Daniel
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
