On 6 December 2012 16:05, Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> wrote: >> > Or you could not put unnecessary bindings into the Device Tree >> > by putting two and two together and realise that using the table >> > is the correct thing to do instead. This actually gives reason >> > to you previous patch, but should probably be fixed-up into it >> > so it has some proper meaning/purpose. ;) >> >> Couldn't understand this one :( > > Really?
I tried again, but couldn't get it :( > Let's break it down - what do you need "stmpe,id" for? To distinguish two instances of of stmpe811 (for instance) on a board. Names of stmpe sub-modules would contain .0, .1, if we have an id passed to it. Passing -1 would create same names for both gpio blocks which belonged to different stmpe811's. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
