Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com> wrote @ Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:06:25 +0100:
...
> > @@ -149,7 +154,26 @@ done:
> >   */
> >  static void __init tegra_smp_init_cpus(void)
> >  {
> > -   unsigned int i, ncores = scu_get_core_count(scu_base);
> > +   unsigned int i, cpu_id, ncores;
> > +   u32 l2ctlr;
> > +   phys_addr_t pa;
> > +
> > +   cpu_id = read_cpuid(CPUID_ID) & CPU_MASK;
> > +   switch (cpu_id) {
> > +   case CPU_CORTEX_A15:
> > +           asm("mrc p15, 1, %0, c9, c0, 2\n" : "=r" (l2ctlr));
> > +           ncores = ((l2ctlr >> 24) & 3) + 1;
> > +           break;
> > +   case CPU_CORTEX_A9:
> > +           /* Get SCU physical base */
> > +           asm("mrc p15, 4, %0, c15, c0, 0" : "=r" (pa));
> > +           scu_base = IO_ADDRESS(pa);
> > +           ncores = scu_get_core_count(scu_base);
> > +           break;
> > +   default:
> > +           BUG();
> 
> instead of bugging out, how about setting ncores to 1 instead ?

Maybe that would be useful in the case of adding new ARM core in the
future.
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to