On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Vivek Gautam <gautamvivek1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Vivek Gautam <gautamvivek1...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Grant Likely >> <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca> wrote: >>> On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 20:22:26 +0530, Vivek Gautam <gautam.vi...@samsung.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Using chip specific compatible string as it should be. >>>> So fixing this for ehci-s5p, ohci-exynos and dwc3-exynos >>>> which till now used a generic 'exynos' in their compatible strings. >>>> >>>> This goes as per the discussion happened in the thread for >>>> [PATCH v2] ARM: Exynos5250: Enabling dwc3-exynos driver >>>> available at: >>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg74145.html >>>> >>>> Vivek Gautam (2): >>>> usb: ehci-s5p/ohci-exynos: Fix compatible strings for the device >>>> usb: dwc3-exynos: Fix compatible strings for the device >>> >>> for both patches: >>> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca> >>> > > Any more thought about this patch-set? > Or does this change seems fine?
These two changes look good to me. For both of them: Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <diand...@chromium.org> _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
