With the migration of Exynos4 clocks to use common clock framework, the old
styled 'xtal' clock is not used anymore. Instead, the clock 'fin_pll' is used
as the tick clock for mct controller.

Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene....@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abra...@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/mct.c |   14 +++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mct.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mct.c
index 448ce86..71e1502 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mct.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mct.c
@@ -487,10 +487,22 @@ static struct local_timer_ops exynos4_mct_tick_ops 
__cpuinitdata = {
 
 static void __init exynos4_timer_resources(struct device_node *np)
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK
+       struct clk *tick_clk;
+
+       tick_clk = clk_get(NULL, "fin_pll");
+       if (IS_ERR(tick_clk))
+               panic("%s: unable to determine tick clock rate\n", __func__);
+       clk_rate = clk_get_rate(tick_clk);
+#else
+       /*
+        * todo: remove this legacy code after adding common clock support for
+        * exynos5250.
+        */
        struct clk *mct_clk;
        mct_clk = clk_get(NULL, "xtal");
-
        clk_rate = clk_get_rate(mct_clk);
+#endif
 
        reg_base = np ? of_iomap(np, 0) : S5P_VA_SYSTIMER;
        if (!reg_base)
-- 
1.7.5.4

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to