Rescinding.

This hunk is already upstream.

On 01/08/2013 03:12 PM, Tony Camuso wrote:
Upstream commit 9e368fa0 added function ipmi_pnp_probe(), which
calls try_smi_init() directly.

try_smi_init() allocates resources for IPMI driver. However
try_smi_init() can be called again, and the allocated resources
can be unexpectedly released when the same IPMI resource
information is found on both ACPI namespace and SMBIOS table.
ipmi_pnp_probe() should call add_smi() instead of try_smi_init()

For reference, see upstream commit ...
2407d77a1a013b88ee3b817f2b934e420e5376f5

Signed-off-by: Tony Camuso <tcam...@redhat.com>

---
  drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c |    2 +-
  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
index afb89be..20d13c6 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
@@ -2223,7 +2223,7 @@ static int __devinit ipmi_pnp_probe(struct pnp_dev *dev,
      info->dev = &dev->dev;
      pnp_set_drvdata(dev, info);

-    return try_smi_init(info);
+    return add_smi(info);

  err_free:
      kfree(info);

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to