On Jan 15, 2013 2:06 AM, "Tony Lindgren" <t...@atomide.com> wrote: > > * Ezequiel Garcia <elezegar...@gmail.com> [121223 13:49]: > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Daniel Mack <zon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > + > > > +Example for an AM33xx board: > > > + > > > + gpmc: gpmc@50000000 { > > > + compatible = "ti,am3352-gpmc"; > > > + ti,hwmods = "gpmc"; > > > + reg = <0x50000000 0x1000000>; > > > + interrupts = <100>; > > > + gpmc,num-cs = <8>; > > > + gpmc,num-waitpins = <2>; > > > + #address-cells = <2>; > > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > > + ranges = <0 0 0x08000000 0x2000>; /* CS0: NAND */ > > > + > > > + nand@0,0 { > > > + reg = <0 0 0>; /* CS0, offset 0 */ > > > > I'm a bit confused by this: what are the other two values in "reg"? > > I see you've only added a binding for CS. > > > > I've extended a bit on your work and added a binding to enable OneNAND > > device on my IGEP board. > > > > I might send some patches in case anyone wants to give it a try. > > Daniel, should this be updated to just pass the CS?
No, as Rob pointed out earlier in a thread about this topic, the 'ranges' feature will help doing the math for the offset calculation eventually, so we need to pass all three values. Regards, Daniel
_______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss