On 01/16/2013 09:13 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote: > From: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com> > > This binding is intended to represent the hardware reset signals present > internally in most IC (SoC, FPGA, ...) designs. > > Such a binding would allow the creation of a "reset subsystem", which > could replace APIs such as the following Tegra-specific API: > > void tegra_periph_reset_deassert(struct clk *c); > void tegra_periph_reset_assert(struct clk *c); > > (Note that at present, Tegra couples reset assertion with the clock for > the affected peripheral module. However, reset and clocking are two > separate, yet admittedly related, concepts). > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>
You probably want to update the patch description; it was somewhat appropriate when I sent the patch as an RFC to see what people thought about the idea, but now you're actually providing the whole thing a more specific description would be better. Your S-o-b line should be present in all patches you send; add it after mine. See Documentation/SubmittingPatches section "Sign your work" item (c) (or perhaps (b) if you modified it). _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss