Hi,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 05:40:04PM +0530, kishon wrote:
> >>+void omap_control_usb_host_mode(struct device *dev)
> >>+{
> >>+ u32 val;
> >>+ struct omap_control_usb *control_usb = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >>+
> >>+ val = AVALID | VBUSVALID;
> >>+
> >>+ writel(val, control_usb->otghs_control);
> >
> >I would like to make this future proof too:
> >
> >val = readl(ctrl->otghs_control);
> >val |= OMAP_CTRL_DEV_AVALID | OMAP_CTRL_DEV_VBUSVALID;
> >writel(val, ctrl->otghs_control);
>
> I think we might then have to add
> val &= ~(IDDIG | SESSEND) right?right, my bad ;-) > >Another idea is to try to get the extra resource below, if it fails you > >try to continue without it ;-) > > I prefer the way it is now because mailbox is needed for MUSB to be > functional in OMAP4 and we should fail if we don't have it. No? could be, that would mean an error on DT data though. -- balbi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
