Hi,
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.k...@intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 05:17:09PM +0530, Padmavathi Venna wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Padmavathi Venna <padm...@samsung.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/dmaengine.h | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
>> index 8cd0e25..c88f302 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
>> @@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ static inline struct dma_chan
>> *__dma_request_channel(dma_cap_mask_t *mask,
>> static inline struct dma_chan *dma_request_slave_channel(struct device *dev,
>> char *name)
>> {
>> - return NULL
>> + return NULL;
> what tree was this generated against? this was fixed by 678bd8
I generated against Kukjin for-next branch. I just noticed that it's
fixed in your next branch. I will drop this patch.
Thanks
Padma
>
> --
> ~Vinod
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
