On Tuesday 05 February 2013 08:22 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
Doesn't look very elegant to me, but I wouldn't mind if there is no better option. Even then, we can't rely on the device name as its index can change based on where it is
Well, thats what I said in the first mail, that *if* you are able to fix the device name, *then* we could use clkdev the way its used in non-DT case. But then you came back saying 'Fixing the device name doesn't really solve the problem.' :)
located in the dts file. e.g. in the beginning it may be named phy.8, and if a device node is added before it, it will get changed to phy.9
If you provide a phandle to the PHY node in the board node, for which you need to add the clk alias, you can always extract the device (using of_find_device_by_node() ) and hence its name, so it doesn't matter if its phy.8 or phy.9. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
