On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote: > On Wednesday 06 February 2013 17:38:20 Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Thierry Reding >> <thierry.red...@avionic-design.de> wrote: >> >> > When using deferred driver probing, PCI host controller drivers may >> > actually require this function after the init stage. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.red...@avionic-design.de> >> >> There seem to be a proliferation of these patches now. >> >> Isn't this just papering over the real problem? The discarding >> of __init sections need to happen *after* all deferred probes >> are complete, lest we have to remove *all* __init sections from >> *all* drivers in the kernel, don't we? > > No, I think it's not quite that bad. I think the rule is still > just that .probe() functions and anything called from them must > not be __init. They used to be __devinit, which would cause > problems with deferred probing on !HOTPLUG systems but that's > gone in 3.9. > > Thierry's patch is just necessary because pci_common_init used > to be called only from actual __init functions, and not it > gets called from a .probe() function for the first time.
Aha OK, then it feels much better now. However it leaves the question of how much __init, __initdata and __initconst we have littering around. Oh, well, we'll see I guess. Thanks, Linus Walleij _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
