On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:56:54AM +0200, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 06:25:13PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > OK, so that's certainly an argument for requesting a specific clock name > > rather than NULL. > The list of possible parents for each clock is determined by the SoC and is > already known to CCF, so maybe we just need to add a function to CCF to allow > the drivers to query the list of possible parents? Assuming that "CCF" is the clock framework that's pretty much what I was suggesting, yes.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
