On 14 April 2013 01:43, Francesco Lavra <francescolavra...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> +     for_each_child_of_node(of_find_node_by_path("/cpus"), np) {
>
> If of_find_node_by_path() returns NULL, there will be a NULL pointer
> dereference.
>
>> +             if (count++ != cpu_dev->id)
>> +                     continue;
>> +             if (!of_get_property(np, "operating-points", NULL))
>> +                     return -ENODATA;
>> +
>> +             cpu_dev->of_node = np;
>> +
>> +             ret = of_init_opp_table(cpu_dev);
>> +             if (ret)
>> +                     return ret;
>> +
>> +             return 0;
>
> of_node_put() should be called on np before returning.
> Also, the reference count of the parent node should be decremented as well.
>
> These comments apply to the below function dt_get_transition_latency() too.

Thanks Francesco.

Below fixes this (I will send it separately to Rafael):

Subject: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: ARM big LITTLE: put DT nodes after using them

DT nodes should be put using of_node_put() to balance their usage counts. This
is not done properly in ARM's big LITTLE driver. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little_dt.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little_dt.c
b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little_dt.c
index 452ff46..44be311 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little_dt.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little_dt.c
@@ -31,22 +31,28 @@

 static int dt_init_opp_table(struct device *cpu_dev)
 {
-       struct device_node *np = NULL;
+       struct device_node *np, *parent;
        int count = 0, ret;

-       for_each_child_of_node(of_find_node_by_path("/cpus"), np) {
+       parent = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
+       if (!parent) {
+               pr_err("failed to find OF /cpus\n");
+               return -ENOENT;
+       }
+
+       for_each_child_of_node(parent, np) {
                if (count++ != cpu_dev->id)
                        continue;
-               if (!of_get_property(np, "operating-points", NULL))
-                       return -ENODATA;
-
-               cpu_dev->of_node = np;
-
-               ret = of_init_opp_table(cpu_dev);
-               if (ret)
-                       return ret;
-
-               return 0;
+               if (!of_get_property(np, "operating-points", NULL)) {
+                       ret = -ENODATA;
+               } else {
+                       cpu_dev->of_node = np;
+                       ret = of_init_opp_table(cpu_dev);
+               }
+               of_node_put(np);
+               of_node_put(parent);
+
+               return ret;
        }

        return -ENODEV;
@@ -54,15 +60,24 @@ static int dt_init_opp_table(struct device *cpu_dev)

 static int dt_get_transition_latency(struct device *cpu_dev)
 {
-       struct device_node *np = NULL;
+       struct device_node *np, *parent;
        u32 transition_latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL;
        int count = 0;

-       for_each_child_of_node(of_find_node_by_path("/cpus"), np) {
+       parent = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
+       if (!parent) {
+               pr_err("failed to find OF /cpus\n");
+               return -ENOENT;
+       }
+
+       for_each_child_of_node(parent, np) {
                if (count++ != cpu_dev->id)
                        continue;

                of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-latency", &transition_latency);
+               of_node_put(np);
+               of_node_put(parent);
+
                return 0;
        }
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to