If any of the GPMC child nodes fails, this shouldn't make the
whole gpmc_probe_dt() function to fail. It is better to just
WARN and allow other devices probe function to succeed.

Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk>
---

Changes since v1 (suggested by Jon Hunter):
  - Split the search for GPMC child nodes and only warn if a
    child probe fails on two different patches
  - Add a warn message to report which GPMC child probe failed

 arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c |    5 ++---
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
index 6166847..6c4da12 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
@@ -1533,10 +1533,9 @@ static int gpmc_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
                         of_node_cmp(child->name, "nor") == 0)
                        ret = gpmc_probe_generic_child(pdev, child);
 
-               if (ret < 0) {
+               if (WARN(ret < 0, "%s: probing gpmc child %s failed\n",
+                        __func__, child->full_name))
                        of_node_put(child);
-                       return ret;
-               }
        }
 
        return 0;
-- 
1.7.7.6

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to