Thankyou for the comments.
On 08/05/13 16:01, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 04:50:22PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>>> In many cases a single syconf register contains bits related to multiple
>>> devices, and therefore it need to be shared across multiple drivers at
>>> bit level. The same IP block can have different syscon mappings on
>>> different SOCs.
>> My feeling is that syscon is the wrong place for this functionality,
>> since regmap already handles (some of?) these issues. If you need
>> additional synchronization, it's probably best to extend regmap
>> as needed so other code besides syscon can take advantage of that
>> as well.
> This sounds like regmap_update_bits() ought to be all that's needed.

Ultimately the syscon_write use the regmap_update_bits, however we really want 
is the flexibility in using/referring the syscon registers/bits in both 
device-trees and non-device tree cases.

The reason for these APIs, is the extent of syscon usage is very high in ST 
set-top-box parts.

Without these new APIs, its very difficult to pass this information to
the drivers.

Thanks,
srini
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to