On 05/27/2013 02:54 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > Hi, > > On Monday 27 May 2013 11:04 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >> Hi Kishon, >> >> I have some comment about this patch >> and upload modified patch to following repository (extcon-for-palmas). >> - >> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/extcon.git/commit/?h=extcon-for-palmas&id=f2b7cb80699cbe1a5fd6c97ef2c600915f8d7f2c >> >> This patchset include patch related to other module >> ,so I need your opinion to apply this patchset to git repository. > > yeah.. Still there is some confusion with palmas_set_switch_smps10(). I think > we can remove it for now and add it separately later. By this at least we can > have device mode fully functional in OMAP5. What do you think? >
I agree your opinion. But, I propose some fixes about palmas_set_switch_smps10(). I dont' prefer to call global function in exton-palmas.c from palmas-regulator.c. So, Why don't you use regulator consumer instead of global function? You can register specific regulator for enabling or disabling SMPS10_SWITCH_EN and then control SMPS10_SWITCH_EN bit through regulator framework in extcon-palmas.c without calling global function. Thanks, Chanwoo Choi _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
