Hi Pekon,

On 05/20/2013 06:44 AM, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
>  
>>>>>
>>>>>   am33xx_pinmux: pinmux@44e10800 {
>>>>>           pinctrl-names = "default";
>>>>> -         pinctrl-0 = <&matrix_keypad_s0 &volume_keys_s0>;
>>>>> +         pinctrl-0 = <&matrix_keypad_s0 &volume_keys_s0
>>>>> +                 &nandflash_pins_s0>;
>>>>
>>>> Why add this to the board level fallback (called pinctrl hogs, I think)?
>>>> This can be part of nand node you added below so that the pinctrl will
>>>> take effect when nand gets probed instead of all the time.
>>>
>>> Yes we should have all the pinctrl entries under the related drivers.
>>> This makes it easy remux pins during runtime if needed, and also
>>> allows unloading pinctrl-single.ko for development.
>>>
>> Yes, accepted. This has been already fixed in v3 of this patch set.
>> If all fine, then please pull this for next merge..
>>
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2013-May/046712.html
>>
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2013-May/046814.html
>>
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2013-May/046710.html
>>
>>
>> with regards, pekon
> 
> Request you to please accept | provide feedbacks on this patch series.
> These are waiting acceptance since Jan-2013, and are necessary for 
> DT based configs for board having NAND support.
> 
> with regards, pekon

Sorry, I missed that series.

I'm applying it right now.

Thanks,
Benoit


_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to