On 23:25 Wed 29 May , Grant Likely wrote: > On Tue, 28 May 2013 17:08:47 +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > <plagn...@jcrosoft.com> wrote: > > as we count valid mapped irq not just present irq > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagn...@jcrosoft.com> > > Hmmm, even with it being in-accurately named, I think it is dangerous to > rename the existing function and re-use the old name. Anyone with > out-of-tree code will get the behaviour changed under their feet. I > think it would be better to drop this patch from the series.
after think I known this can be consider as noisy change but I think we could rename it anyway to make it more clear and use a different name as you propose for the counting irq in PATCH 2/3 Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
