On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:41:38AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Wei Yongjun <weiyj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn>
> >
> > In many of the error handling case, the return value 'ret' not set
> > and 0 will be return from d40_probe() even if error, but we should
> > return a negative error code instead in those error handling case.
> > This patch fixed them, and also removed useless variable 'err'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn>
> > ---
> > v1 -> v2: rebased on linux-next.git
> 
> I've tentatively applied this to my dma40 branch, waiting for Vinod
> to ACK it.
I though you wanted me to apply this :)

Nevertheless, Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.k...@intel.com>

Can you CC stable too, pls.

--
~Vinod

-- 
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to